Printed from the ArchiMentor Knowledge pages on - www.archimentor.net
Floor Strength For Mobile Elevated Working PlatformsIt is known that there have been a number of unreported failures of floor systems, typically in areas such as atria and shopping centres, resulting from the loads applied by the mobile access equipment used for cleaning and maintenance. The failures have been related primarily to the use of mobile equipment with solid rubber wheels, which apply a highly concentrated load to the floor. Mobile equipment fitted with large pneumatic tyres, which spread the load over a larger area, causes fewer problems.
Investigation has revealed that the majority of failures have been caused by:
A small number of the failures are attributable to inadequate specification of the insulation within the floor system build-up, but this problem may increase as floor insulation becomes more common and floor insulation gets thicker. There is also the potential for confusion caused by the use of different units of measurement for the different elements of the floor and the loads applied.
102 kg/m2 = 1 kPa = 1 kN/m2 = 0.001 N/mm2
Screeds have traditionally been specified prescriptively with testing restricted to soundness (now referred to as in-situ crushing resistance or ISCR) and with little or no reference made to the required compressive strength. This is probably because most screeds have a significant safety factor over the normal loads likely to be applied.
Typical compressive strengths are:
There are many insulation board products suitable for underfloor use. Two of the better-known products are:
It is crucial to note these quoted nominal strengths (for both companies) are based on tests to BS EN 826 at 10% compression. 10% compression of the insulation under a screed is almost certain to cause the screed to fail. It is therefore essential to ignore the nominal compressive strength values and use, instead, the "Design Load" figures provided by both companies. (The two companies named above use different methods for calculating the design load: Jabfloor is tested at 1% strain to BS EN 826; Floormate is tested to a 2% maximum deflection over 50 years to BS EN 1606.) The two methods produce slightly different results, which make comparison difficult, but show a reduction to between 30% and 45% of the nominal compressive strength.
The loads applied to the floor system (finish + screed + insulation) will depend on the type of equipment to be used. Large self-propelled scissor lifts with solid rubber tyres, intended for indoor use, generate the highest tyre contact pressures, up to 1400 kPa (= 1.4 N/mm2). This is well within the compressive strength of a properly-laid cementitious or anhydrite screed but it will still be necessary to check the compressive strength of the insulation.
Genie Industries [http://genielift.com/] supply a wide range of mobile access equipment and their website provides full specification details, including weights, tyre loads, and tyre contact pressures, for the various items of equipment supplied.
The typical calculation method is shown below:
Note that in this example the load generated by a large (but not extreme) piece of equipment applied to a typical screed has generated a requirement for one of the strongest insulation board products available on the market.
Page last reviewed: 28/10/2009
Legislation, British (and other) Standards, and industry practices, may have changed since the date above. Read our
Terms and Conditions
Specialist Architectural Services
Cladding advice
Knowledge sharing
Mentoring
Specification writing
Want advice from the creator of ArchiMentor? Click the links above to see how the smallest architectural practice can compete on equal terms with the largest.